• Главная страница
  • О нас
  • Наши услуги
    • Администрация компании
    • Финансовый менеджмент
    • Бухгалтерия и бухгалтерский учет
  • Клиенты
  • Новости
  • Контакты
  • Global Connect Consultancy
  • zh
  • nl
  • ja
  • fr
  • en
  • de

Preventing Trademark Revocation in China

09 Авг 2022
Actual, China, IP

An increasing amount of overseas companies are registering their trademarks in China. While following the updated intellectual property (IP) regulations in China, solely registering the trademark is not sufficient. In certain cases, your trademark can be revoked or cancelled by the administrating Trademark Office. In this article, the reasons for trademark revocation, the consequences, and methods to prevent this revocation in China are addressed.

 

Introduction

Trademark revocation could happen to a successfully registered trademark. This happens most frequently when the owner of the trademark uses or administrates the trademark improperly. In the case that a trademark gets cancelled or revoked, the company suffers not only economic losses but also the corporate image, branding and marketing strategies can be negatively impacted. In combination with the revoking or cancellation of the trademark, the owner of the trademark also risks the permanent loss of the trademark. To avoid unnecessary hassle around trademark management, especially foreign investors should be acquainted with the everchanging regulations around (protecting) Intellectual Property.

The Trademark Law of China, emphasises that a registered trademark can be both cancelled or revoked by the Trademark Office for a multitude of reasons. Here are the four main reasons described:

 

  • The trademark registrant fails to renew the trademark in time.

After the date of registration, the registered trademark is valid for ten years. Within the 12 months before the expiry date of the trademark, the registrant is able and ought to renew the trademark. Whenever the registrant does not complete the formalities before this stipulated period, an extension of six months (grace period) can be possibly allowed. If the registration is not completed within this “grace period”, the trademark gets cancelled.

 

  • Trademark fail to use the trademark properly.

The Chinese trademark law argues that the trademark needs to be consistently used with the registered trademark. Changes to the registration data, such as inconsistencies in colour, font, logo, combination of elements, etc. are seen as the non-standard usage of the trademark. In this case, the trademark registrant is ordered to clarify these disputes by the local administration for market regulation (local AMR). Whenever the registrant does not follow this order, the Trademark Office will revoke the registered trademark.

 

  • The trademark registrant fails to practically and continuously use the registered trademark.

The Chinese trademark law obliges that the registered trademark needs to be continuously and actively used for the registered product/service. Further, the trademark should be used in the registered region (e.g. Beijing). If the trademark is unutilized for over three years consecutively, and there is no legal reasoning behind the lack of usage, any organisation or individual can apply to the Trademark Office for revocation of this particular trademark. In recent years, the lack of actual and continuous usage of the trademark is the most common cause of trademark revocation in China.

 

  • The trademark becomes a generic name of the approved commodity

In the case when a certain name can refer to a class of goods Chinese law emphasises that this name shall be recognized as a generic overarching name. China-Briefing mentions that the brand name Simmons (席梦思) has its origin as a trademark registered in the United States by Mr Zalmon G. Simmons.  The trademark “Simmons” was used for his mattress brand, however, it quickly became widely used in China to refer to “refined spring mattress”. As the name for a special good became applicable to the commodity of a spring mattress, the Trademark Office declined the registration of this trademark in 2015 due to becoming a generic name in Chinese society. In the Netherlands, this shift from good to commodity is comparable to the activity around the brand name “ty-rip”. Whereas this product launched in 1958 as a stand-alone product, the name “ty-rip” is now utilized for all products looking like or having a similar function as the original ty-rip.

Knowing that trademark revocation after three-year inactivity is the most common reasoning for trademark revocation, the underlying incentive to let the Trademark Office revoke another’s trademark is obvious. Living in the era of globalisation and developing technology, all market players can stay updated on others’ intellectual property. Applicants revoking another’s trademark can use this to take advantage. The business value attached to the trademark can be destroyed by revoking or cancelling the trademark.

However, this attached value can also be used to gain own profit by using this business value or by linking their own products to this trademark. Another case can be that their own trademark registration is blocked by the Trademark Office due to the similarities to this already existing trademark. All these reasonings can be a strategical approach to entering the (Chinese) market or to eradicate the competition.

 

Revoked or cancelled trademark

When the trademark gets revoked or cancelled, the trademark cannot be legally used on the registered goods/services. Trademark owners continuing to use their trademark, do not only act against the Chinese trademark law but can also infringe the other’s similar trademark which can lead to a lawsuit and economic compensation liabilities.

While losing the trademark can result in economic losses, disputes in the corporate image, and incoherent marketing strategies, the following year the revoked/cancelled trademark cannot be re-approved by the Trademark Office. This means that a similar trademark will also not be approved. In this case, the registrant needs to wait for minimally a year to re-apply for the trademark. After one year, the competitor is also able to simultaneously apply for their trademark. In China’s “first to file” approach, this can lead to the loss of your original trademark.

In the case that trademarks are applied to be revoked by others, the trademark owner receives a request from the Trademark Office to reply within two months to receive additional information. Included in this data are:

  • Defend that the trademark is not a generic name
  • Showcase evidence of actual use in the last three years of the trademark
  • State the reason for not using the trademark

This information can be provided in various document types (e.g. invoices, contracts, etc.) and is analysed by the Trademark Office. If the evidence is deemed effective, the Trademark Office will reject the other party’s request. However, if the information is insufficient the trademark will get revoked by the Trademark Office.

 

Conclusion

To conclude, registering your trademark in China is not sufficient. To prevent the cancellation or revoking of your trademark in China, assure to continuously utilize the trademark according to the Chinese trademark regulations. Lastly, be assured to take action and reply within the given period to prevent revocation as raised by another party.

 

Sources:

Trademark Revocation in China: A Practical Guide (china-briefing.com)

The “use” requirement in trademark revocation cases in China – HEFFELS SPIEGELER ADVOCATEN

Trade Marks Laws and Regulations Report 2022 China (iclg.com)

India Preparing for Digital Sustainability Reporting

26 Июл 2022
Actual, BRSR, EFRAG, XBRL
BRSR, Financial reporting, India, XBRL

The vanguard of digital reporting, India, is preparing to enable the filing of the new Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) in XBRL format. The two major stock exchanges in India announced the availability of online XBRL submission portals for listed companies. If your business is active in India, then filing BRSR could be mandatory in the financial year 2022-2023.

This month, two of the principal stock exchanges of India have issued circulars announcing online XBRL submission portals for listed companies. Both the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) and the BSE (formerly known as Bombay Stock Exchange) have reported on the availability of this online XBRL for Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) reporting.

The BRSR filing is developed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and is the “more detailed and comprehensive” replacement for the current Business Responsibility Report (BRR). As of now, this BRSR filing is -just like the ongoing EFRAG drafts— voluntary. Whereas the latter is still in the draft phase and awaits further developments to become part of the reporting environment, the BRSR is voluntary in the 2021-2022 financial year. During this period, Indian businesses are allowed to “establish and improve their reporting processes”. Yet, in the second phase of the BRSR development (the fiscal year 2022-2023), the BRSR shall be mandatory for the top 1,000 companies in India. Currently, both the XBRL and PDF format are required for the BRSR filing.

eXtensible Business Report Language (XBRL) is a standard global framework which enables the effective exchange of data using the (online) XBRL reporting format. With various countries hopping on the global trend of XBRL adaptation, implementing an XBRL software solution results in various benefits and is deemed as a requirement to maintain efficiency and stay competitive in the current marketplace.

With the flexibility and extensibility of XBRL, enterprises can utilize and extend taxonomy to fit their specific needs. The usage of XBRL creates emphasise on these standardized “tags”, resulting in enhanced and automatic validation, comparison, and analysis of data. While this reduces labour due to efficient and effective “tagging”, using the overarching and commonly-known XBRL taxonomy for filing data creates immediate comparable data and financial transparency for investors.

Moreover, to assist these listed entities in understanding the “updated disclosure requirements and concepts associated with the new format of BRSR”, the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) has in cooperation with the Stakeholder Empowerment Services (SES) released 38 sector-specific guides in understanding the BRSR format. These guides provide in-depth information regarding the parameters in the format and give guidance on how to report and measure these parameters.

 

Sources:

https://www.xbrl.org/news/india-gears-up-for-digital-sustainability-reporting/

https://static.nseindia.com/s3fs-public/inline-files/NSE_Circular_08072022_1.pdf

https://www.nseindia.com/resources/insights-panel-discussions-seminars-corporate-governance

Digital incorporation of limited liability companies

19 Июл 2022
Actual
companies, digital, incorporation, limited liability

 

As of 1 August 2022 digital incorporation of a capital company will be possible under directive 2019/1151 of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 20, 2019 (the “Directive“). This means that the costs, time, and administrative burdens will be drastically reduced and setting up a Dutch BV will be more accessible through the system of digital incorporation of limited liability companies.

Digitizing the setting up of a Dutch BV is an important step towards the modernization of Dutch company law in general, as well as the notarial profession as a whole. Important to note it will only be possible for Dutch BV’s to be incorporated online if the shares are paid-up in cash.

A digital deed of incorporation will be utilized along with the digital identification by the notary by way of livestream video connection. This eliminates the requirement to be physically present at the office of the notary to execute the notarial paper deed of incorporation. A new title is added to the Civil-Law Notaries Act. This title paves the way towards the digital execution of the incorporation deed.

The Royal Notarial Professional Organization provided a centralized online execution platform that has implemented the digital incorporation process including a digital identifier that uses the highest security level pursuant to the EU regulation on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the European Single Market (eIDAS regulation). This maintains the gatekeeper role of the notary. The parties execute the deed by way of an electronic signature through the online platform.

The Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security have approached the completion of the legislation process in a cautious manner. The Netherlands embarks to implement the Directive as soon as possible but in any event before 1 August 2022.

The first version of the Digital Incorporation System is already finalized and is therefore ready to use when the Directive is implemented. The KNB is currently working on a platform for notaries to become acquainted with the Digital Incorporation System. There will also be an opportunity to give feedback on the system. Based on this, the KNB will improve the Digital Incorporation System for the final version.

 

Sources:

https://vancampenliem.com/blog/digital-formation-of-a-dutch-private-company-with-limited-liability-the-so-called-dutch-bvs/

https://www.kvk.nl/english/rules-and-laws/rules-and-regulations-changes-for-businesses-as-of-1-july-2022/

https://business.gov.nl/amendment/setting-up-bv-through-video-connection/

Stimulating Market Integration: Developments Around ESAP

12 Июл 2022
Actual, Current news, ESEF

At the recent XBRL Europe conference (13-14 June 2022), Jean-Phillippe Rabine from the European Commission (EC) provided an update on the revolutionary European Single Access Point (ESAP). With the ESAP platform, more than 150,000 entities file data to create a centralized search system covering all public information on companies or financial products. This way, enterprises are more integrated into the market and cross-country investors can establish contact in an uncomplicated manner.

The update on the developments of the European Single Access Point (ESAP) entails the goal to provide unified access to a huge amount of information, relevant to investors of all sizes. This unified access is projected to cover the regulated activities of over 150,000 companies. This target group includes investment funds, insurance companies, public companies, banks, rating agencies and around 45,000 large private companies that will disclose sustainability information on the ESAP platform. In general, ESAP is a centralised search system that makes companies more visible to cross-border investors and promotes market integration. In this light, the ESG data provided by the companies will assist in the transition to a green economy.

While the ESAP platform is comparable to EDGAR and EDINET, the main difference in ESAP is to be far-reaching and thus more information gathering can be possible. However, the establishment and the undertaking of ESAP are fairly complicated. The requirement to aggregate and/or index data provided to the national registers and regulators from over 27 countries, as well as numerous EU data collections, is the foundation for the complicated system of ESAP. The platform will be owned by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), operated by ESMA in cooperation with EBA and EIOPA,  and will have input from several other European agencies.

ESAP has high relevance to Inline XBRL filings, as it will be responsible to host all EU-filed financial statements made in European Single Electronic Format (ESEF). Moreover, on par with these statements, ESAP also hosts the upcoming sustainability disclosures as readable in the CSRD. In the long term, the format for the data hosted by ESAP can change from Inline XBRL to various formats. However, while the platform might not be necessarily linked to Inline XBRL in the long run, the European Commission (EC) will have the power to direct that specific disclosures need to be made utilizing a specific machine-readable format.

The intention is that ESAP is accessible free of charge and includes actions covering access via API and bulk downloads. However, ESMA can charge fees on certain occasions or services. To conclude, “the phasing-in phase of legislation and the ESAP system will commence in 2024 and drive through to at least 2026”. Here, Europe’s aims for ESAP are wide-ranging with improvements to capital allocations, providing assistance towards the green economy, and integrating financial services.

 

Sources

https://www.xbrl.org/news/esap-latest-eu-drives-towards-transparency/

https://www.xbrleurope.org/?p=5268

https://www.xbrleurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/1-Rabine-ESAP-XBRL-slide-pack-1.pdf

Customer Due Diligence and Know your Customer requirements in The Netherlands

05 Июл 2022
Actual
KYC, wwft

 

When it comes to knowing your customer, two laws play an important role: The Financial Supervision Act (Wet financieel toezicht), hereinafter Wft and Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme the Wwft.

The supervision of the entire financial system by the Dutch authorities is regulated by the Wft. The Wwft was introduced to prevent and reduce illegal financial activities, including money laundering, fraud and terrorist financing.

Certain institutions and industries are legally obliged to process your data for Know Your Customer purposes. Therefore, this is allowed under the Privacy Act, the General Data Protection Regulation (AVG). We ask you to inform us of any changes in your personal and financial situation.

The purpose is to identify the representatives of the organization. Are there any individuals within the organization with a direct or indirect holding of 25% or more in the organization? They are then registered as ultimately interested parties (UBO). As from March 2022 it is mandatory for most companies to register the UBO’s in the UBO register at the Chamber of Commerce. This amplifies transparency and contributes to the fight against fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing. Check with the Chamber of Commerce whether this is necessary for your company to complete the UBO register. The main source of revenue has to be determined. Having a clear picture of the organization’s structure and business activities aids this process.

Section 1(a) of the Wwft outlines who the legislation applies to: i. Banks; ii. other financial institutions, and iii. designated natural persons, legal persons or companies acting in the exercise of their professional activities. Pursuant to Section 3(2d) of the Wwft, the service provider should be able to monitor the business relationships and the transactions effected during their existence based on its Customer Due Diligence “CDD”. This allows for an investigation into the origin of the funds used in those business relations or transactions.

The Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) id the supervisor of compliance with the Wwft. Among other things, it checks whether the policies and procedures for KYC and CDD of the financial institution comply with the Wwft. DNB also checks whether the institution complies with its own policies and procedures. The Wwft is based on the European Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD). The amended AMDL-4 directive allows the use of electronic ID’s for identity verifications.

The Wwft enforces The Sanctions Act. This Act defines sanctions against certain states, territories or persons, such as the freezing of assets. You can read more on the National Government’s website (Dutch) and in the attachment Law and Regulations Wft, Wwft, and CDD process ING (Dutch).

 

Sources:

https://www.betaalvereniging.nl/en/know-your-customer-in-brief/

https://www.dnb.nl/en/sector-information/supervision-sectors/crypto-service-providers/integrity-supervision-of-crypto-service-providers/wwft-crypto/customer-due-diligence/investigating-the-origin-of-a-customer-s-funds/

https://www.dnb.nl/media/i1xjqk52/dnb-guidance-anti-money-laundering-and-anti-terrorist-financing-act-and-the-sanctions-act-december-2019.pdf

https://www.icpac.org.cy/zePortal/WebFiles/SELK/WebDocuments/Members/General%20Circulars/

2018/4%202018/AML%20Guidance%20on%20establishing%20Source%20of%20Funds%20and%20Source%20of%20Wealth.pdf

Opportunities in the Kazakh Greenhouse Industry

28 Июн 2022
Actual, Kazakhstan
expertise, Greenhouse, Kazakhstan, opportunity

 

 

The Dutch greenhouse industry sets the example for many regions around the world. With the leading position in the agricultural sector, Dutch expertise can be used to enhance greenhouse practices in the agricultural areas in Kazakhstan. In the regions of Nur Sultan and Almaty, hyper-modern greenhouses have been realised with sustainable growing methods and sustainability as a key aspect. However, the construction of Kazakh greenhouses surges and diffuses to less-developed parts of the country. Do you know how to use your expertise and management skills to capitalize on these new opportunities?

 

Introduction

The 1970s mark the era of the first development of greenhouses in the Republic of Kazakhstan. With (winter) greenhouses realised in the 1970s and 1980, the collapse of the soviet union halted these developments. The economic crisis decreased local and foreign investment, and by 1994 the production of greenhouse vegetables declined by more than 200%. The surge in greenhouse development in the 1970s covers the unique selling point of low energy prices. While the company had profitability of +70%-200%, the 1990’s increase in energy prices, abolishing subsidies, and the development of high-yielding crops led to a decrease in the initial 560 hectares of protected ground.

Since 2003, Kazakhstan sees a positive trend in the development, construction, and reconstruction of greenhouses. However, only in the last ten years has the greenhouse industry fully developed. From only 108 greenhouses with a total area of 59 hectares in 2008 to a total greenhouse area of almost 1.200 hectares in 2018. In 2018, the largest areas of greenhouses are concentrated on family farms (618 hectares — 53%). Agricultural enterprises have 180 hectares of area, whereas private farms are in the middle with 366 hectares.

 

Structure of production and yield

According to the market research by Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit, the structure of production can be categorised in three categories. Greenhouses mainly produce cucumbers (49%) and tomatoes (47%). Other vegetables (4%) include aubergine and types of salad. While there is no official data on the yield of vegetables, the calculated data for agricultural enterprises is 26kg/m2 for tomatoes and 23kg/m2 for cucumbers. For greenhouses owned by family farms, the yield is 50% of the agricultural enterprises.

Since Kazakhstan mainly produces tomatoes and cucumbers, other vegetables need to be imported from the bordering countries (e.g. China, Uzbekistan). Sweet pepper and tomatoes are the highest-demand vegetables (12.8 and 38.3 million euro), but also cucumbers (5.9mln. euro) and aubergine (3.5mln euro) are noteworthy import vegetables.

Government support

The Association of Greenhouses of Kazakhstan and the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan developed rules for subsidizing greenhouse construction. Whereas funds initially were allocated per 1 hectare (3.500 euro) to compensate for the costs of greenhouses, nowadays this hectare subsidy is abolished. The producers of greenhouse vegetables have equal rights to government support with producers of other crops. These benefits include loans, subsidies for mineral fertilizer and herbicides, subsidizing the water cost for irrigation, reimbursement of (a part of) the cost for the expansion of greenhouse complexes and implementation of projects, and participating in leasing programs. In practice, only industrial greenhouses can apply for these subsidies. This entails that additional lighting systems and heating systems should be present and that the yield is comparably high.

 

Opportunities

State support including a preferential tax regime in the agricultural business is the main incentive for investment in the Kazakh greenhouse industry. Further, the export channel to Russia can be realised and is sustainable. The development of import substitutes (mainly bell peppers; aubergines; tomatoes) can be an opportunity to enter the local market. The export goods of tomatoes and cucumbers are also gaining foot in other markets such as the Middle East. Moreover, the rapid growth of the greenhouse sector in Kazakhstan (mostly in the south and the northwest of the country) includes the need for experts to lead the project. The Dutch knowledge is therefore required to share knowledge and supervise projects. Besides new greenhouses, reconstructing (older) models can be done to increase yield and apply sustainability principles. Moreover, with 14% of the Kazakh inhabitants working in the agricultural business, potential employees are abundant.

Dalsem argues that these hyper-modern greenhouses have risen in a relatively short period. In the case study of vegetable greenhouse BRBAPK LLP (2022) in Almaty (Kazakhstan) it is noticeable that Dutch knowledge and level of expertise are required. In this new greenhouse, the development of Dutch horticulture showcases a process in the form of “a step of 30 years”. On par, the openness for knowledge and the drive to learn are what make Kazakhs unique and “enables them to take fast steps”. With mutual respect, the Kazakhs learn from the Dutch and cooperate into making this a successful business.

The developments the Dutch can implement and bring to Kazakhstan are aspects such as optimizing production and quality, implementing process computers, and realizing the optimal greenhouse climate. This process computer is the competitive advantage in the Kazakh market. Utilizing the iSii computer, parameters such as the heating, humidification, screens, irrigation and lighting can be controlled and adjusted. With the competitive advantage, the Dutch knowledge goes hand in hand with the Kazakh mentality.

 

Conclusion

As this case study shows, the opportunities in Kazakhstan are evident in the constantly developing greenhouse sector and the aim to maintain expanding the agricultural business. Building these greenhouses is now only done in a couple of main areas (Almaty; Nur Sultan), but can be expanded to other locations. With the production of vegetables such as aubergine and bell peppers, you can enter the local market and fill the current import gap of these vegetables. that Dutch expertise and management can create a top competitor in the Kazakh market, this opportunity is one to keep in mind.

 

Sources

https://www.freshplaza.com/article/9437889/when-investing-in-a-kazakhstan-greenhouse-also-consider-the-most-advantageous-exchange-rate/

https://www.dalsem.com/en/Largest-Kazakh-glass-greenhouse-works-with-Dutch-knowledge-and-technology

https://www.agroberichtenbuitenland.nl/actueel/nieuws/2020/06/19/market-study-on-greenhouse-industry-in-kazakhstan

Market research on RF & KZ Greenhouse Growing

The Conundrum of the Two-Pillar Solution

21 Июн 2022
Actual, Current news, Europe, Netherlands, Tax Planning

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Pillar 2 Rules reached a ground-breaking international accord, with over 130 countries that agreed to impose a minimum 15% corporate tax on multinational enterprises (MNEs) with a global turnover of €750 million or more.


The proposed global minimum tax will be implemented as a “top-up” tax to increase the tax burden of MNEs to at least 15% in countries where the MNEs’ tax burden, on a country-by-country basis, is lower than 15%.


Questions have been raised whether the accounting rules in the consolidated financial statements used in Pillar 2 can be reconciled with local generally accepted accounting principles without incurring considerable extra cost and risk. A particular focus is the risk of double taxation when applying the Pillar 2 rules alongside existing regulations.


The OECD’s model rules on Pillar 2 bring together two interlocking measures:
Firstly, the income inclusion rule (IIR): A top-up tax on the ultimate parent entity of a low-taxed foreign subsidiary; and secondly the undertaxed payment rule (UTPR): The UTPR requires a UTPR taxpayer that is a member of an MNE Group to make an adjustment in respect of any top-up tax that is allocated to that taxpayer from a low-tax Constituent Entity of the same group.


The OECD Model Rules suggest the following for the geographical attribution of additional tax revenue.
Firstly, a Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (QDMTT) can be levied in an under -taxed country where a subsidiary of MNE is located. Secondly, the domicilium country where ultimate parent company is located, can apply a global minimum tax of 15% through the IIR, and lastly in exceptional circumstances where the global minimum tax is not charged under the IIR, other high-tax countries where the members of MNEs are located, can apply the UTPR.


Very few countries are on track to legislate or implement Pillar 2— similarly with Pillar 1, which aims at reallocating taxing rights to reflect an increasingly digitized global economy. There is a serious risk of tax disputes and double-taxation due to the differences in interpretation, application, and legislative enactments which raises the question if it is feasible to set the date for implementation for 2023. While there may be a temptation to leave preparations until everything is set in stone, this would leave your business with dangerously little time to get ready for what is a major overhaul ahead.


Sources:


https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/articles/global-developments-in-international-tax—pillar-2-model-rules/

https://www.tkfd.or.jp/en/research/detail.php?id=884

 

2022 Intellectual Property (CNIPA) regulations: What is New in Regards to the 2019 “New Trademark Act”?

14 Июн 2022
Actual, China, IP
Actual, China, IP, Regulations

 

The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has taken further regulations on trademark usage in China. From 2022 onwards, new rules have been into place that emphasise the detection of fraud and the infringement of laws related to illegal trademark acts in China. This is done to improve the security of private trademarks. The requirements and supervision of using trademarks have become increasingly strict. What do foreign manufacturers need to take into account?

 

The publication of the regulations at the end of December 2021 by the CNIPA aims to strengthen the protection of intellectual property (IP). This publication builds on the trademark laws which are in effect from December 1, 2019. The amendments of the latter relate to the usage of a trademark, claims for damage and opposition to illegal trademark applications. This “new trademark act” focuses on the following three aspects mainly anchored in the Chinese trademark law articles 4, 19 ,33, 63 and 68:

  • Trademarks must be registered and must be proven to not be used previously before registering.
  • Three months after registering the trademark, opposition to this application can be filed at the Chinese Trademark Office.
  • In serious infringements, the statutory damages are RMB 5 million (€711 thousand) and can equal up to five times the actual damage suffered. The counterfeit goods produced under this trademark can get destroyed by the People’s Courts without compensating the counterfeiter. This can only happen at the request of the original trademark.

Whereas these regulations already try to defend the IP of an original trademark or brand, the newly introduced rules improve the security and strictness of intellectual property (IP) in China. The brands themselves need to adhere to around ten new enforcement criteria to further diminish the stealing of IP in China. These regulations are all established according to the Chinese Trademark Law and can be found under the articles 6,10, 43, 49, and 52:

  1. Infringement by (not) using a registered trademark. Chinese Trademark Law acknowledges registered brands in European Trademark Law.
  2. Infringement by signs which may not be used as a trademark.
  3. The term “well-known mark” may not be used in commercial activities
  4. The trademark licensee is not allowed to fail to indicate its name and the origin of the goods
  5. Infringement is where the trademark applicant, in the course of using the registered trademark, changes the registered trademark, name, address or other registered particulars of the applicant on its own initiative.
  6. Infringement by using unregistered trademarks as registered trademarks
  7. Violation of provisions on the registration and administration of collective marks and certification marks, and failure to comply with obligations to administer collective marks and certification marks.
  8. Violation of the provisions for the administration of trademark printing and failure to fulfil the duties of trademark printing administration.
  9. Infringement through malicious application for trade mark registration.
  10. Other infringements of the trade mark administration order

 

Especially interesting for foreign manufacturers are articles 14 and 23 of the new regulation.

  • According to rule 23, using a trademark which is not registered in China but instead is registered somewhere else in the world (e.g. Europe), the owner gets seen as a trademark infringer in China.
  • If an unregistered trademark with multiple meanings is used, this may be considered a breach of the rules (Rule 14). This is the case whenever the Chinese public gets the impression that this particular sign cannot be used as a trademark according to Article 10 (6-8).
    • Signs referring to ethnically discriminatory persons.
    • Signs that can make the public misunderstand the product (e.g. quality, place of origin).
    • Signs that go against socialist morals and norms.

 

To conclude, the rules in China are becoming stricter in order to tackle the theft of intellectual property. However, while these rules are good for foreign investors, they still need to be careful to not use a European-registered trademark without registering it in China. Further, the signs and articles can be interpreted differently in a cultural context. We recommend interpreting these in the broadest sense and trying to avoid risk at all costs. Infringement in China can be expensive and troublesome.

 

Sources:

https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2021/12/16/art_75_172237.html

http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-10/22/content_5443183.htm

Presidents Summit 2022, Northern Europe’s leading Business conference, Copenhagen Denmark. Rethinking Business

05 Июн 2022
Actual, Aktuelles, Current news, Europe, GCA on Tour, IFRS

Through adversity we grow and this year’s summit taught to inspire just that; the tools needed to adapt in this vast — changing world and in every step of the way, to grow and draw strength and purpose from what has happened in the past. 

The PS provided a platform for actionable insights, inspiration and networking with over 2000 meet-ups held per day at the 2021 Summit. Global Connect Consultancy B.V., together with Global Connect Admin B.V.  again this year enriched their professional know-how and built on its vast & steadfast network!

It is the ability to find harmony in the noise and to know there is a safety net when we err. According to Itay Talgam this can be achieved by our ability to recognize and explore gaps, our decision to interpret the plans we create. This speaker is an orchestral conductor who teaches leadership by looking at examples of world leading maestros. In his book The ignorant Maestro Talgam explains that sometimes the best way to stimulate and let people develop their full potential under your direction is to be ignorant. Leaders do not have to be the one who knows everything, but the one who helps his leaders to develop their full potential and to coordinate the team so that those energies flow in a common sense, as happens in a well-assembled orchestra. He teaches his audience not to mind the gaps but to use them.

Other experts on the stage included Daniel Pink, expert on human behavior who aims to teach businesses that regret is both healthy and universal and an integral part of human life. Regret is not abnormal or dangerous, it clarifies what we value and teaches us to be better if we can learn from it.

Dr. Frederik Pferdt, CIE of Google teaches around the central idea that “it’s important to create an environment where everyone is allowed to bring in opinions”. His teachings focus on human mindset and how it channels our inner attitude towards every external event and how to reprogram our negativity bias and start inventing a better future, today.

Noteworthy insights from Linda Hill included inter alia that “most innovations arise from the collision of different ideas, perspectives, and ways of processing emotions”. Organizations are increasingly faced with pressure to innovate, but lack the tools to fuel, inspire and sustain that innovation. In summary the professor teaches her audience to reduce their should’ve and could’ve; be collaborative-ready; develop your successors and paying attention to both scale and speed.

We would like to thank our hosts at this years’ President’s Summit for the outstanding event that was had! Your hospitality is remarkable and the teachings are what we will draw from in the coming year. Thank you!

Join the leaders of future, the investors of tomorrow, and the founders of TODAY! Join Global Connect Consultancy B.V., your trusted partner in financial reporting — today, tomorrow and into the future. Our professional global team will ensure that you regain control of your financial data, allowing you to focus on your core business.

 

EFRAG launches draft Sustainability Report Standards

22 Май 2022
Actual, EFRAG, ESEF, IFRS, Sustainability
EFRAG, Global Connect Admin, Global Connect Consultancy

 

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has released exposure drafts (ED) of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRSs). With this proposal, requirements are set out for European companies to report on various environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics including societal impacts, risks and opportunities.

The European Commission’s proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) envisages the adoption of the EU Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Regarding the latter, EFRAG was requested to assist the European Commission in establishing Sustainability Reporting Standards.

EFRAG, as a technical advisor, aims at providing relevant stakeholder information and analyses on sustainability and ESG subjects to the European Commission. This is done to inform the manner of ESRS adoption by the EU. EFRAG decided to launch the public consultation based on the exposure drafts created under the responsibility of the Project Task Force (PTF-ESRS).

A consultation period of 100 days has been launched with the deadline of 8 August 2022 wherein companies can comment on the draft and share relevant information. Incorporating the input and result from the public consultation together with the feedback on the exposure drafts, EFRAG will agree on the final set of draft ESRS to be submitted to the European Commission.

After further evaluations, the finalised version of the ESRS applies the new sustainability standards according to the disclosures made under the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Bridging finance and sustainability, the ESRS promise to expand mandatory sustainability reporting to European companies as the ongoing drafts are a “journey towards a faithful representation of sustainability performance”.

EFRAG invites comments on all aspects of the draft ESRS and expects feedback no later than 8 August 2022.

  • 1
  • 2
AlternativerTweet   in 7 hours  T

Информация о компании

Global Connect Admin B.V.
Ridderspoorweg 61
1032 LL Amsterdam
+31 (0)20 76 01 540
info@globalconnectadmin.com

связаться с нами

We are a member of the German-Dutch Chamber of Commerce

We are a member of the German-Dutch Chamber of Commerce

Заявление о конфиденциальности
Официальное уведомление

Посетите наши профили в социальных сетях

LinkedIn

Twitter

WeChat account: globalconnectadmin

© 2015 Global Connect Admin B.V. - All Rights Reserved.
This website uses cookies. Why? Click HERE to read more.Accept